Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39591121›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Immune Response Against Influenza in a Cohort of Repeatedly Vaccinated Adults During the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 Seasons.

Raquel Guiomar, Susana Pereira da Silva, Ana Paula Rodrigues, Inês Costa, Patrícia Conde, Paula Cristóvão, Pedro Pechirra, Paulo Estragadinho, Kamal Mansinho, Olav Hungnes and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Raquel GuiomarNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-6315
Susana Pereira da SilvaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2524-0548
Ana Paula RodriguesDepartment of Epidemiology, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Inês CostaNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Patrícia CondeNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0002-5478-5117
Paula CristóvãoNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro PechirraNational Reference Laboratory for Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses, Infectious Diseases Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Paulo EstragadinhoDepartment of Occupational Medicine, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Kamal MansinhoCentro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, 1449-005 Lisbon, Portugal.
Olav HungnesNorwegian National Influenza Centre, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, 0213 Oslo, Norway.
António Silva GraçaDepartment of Occupational Medicine, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Baltazar NunesNational School of Public Health, NOVA University, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThe influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is recommended each autumn and winter season by the relevant authorities in EU/EEA countries. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of repeated trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) uptake during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons on vaccine-derived immunity against influenza.

methodsA cohort study of HCWs vaccinated with an annual TIV was conducted from October 2017 to June 2019. The protective antibodies against the influenza vaccine strains were assessed at three time points: prior to vaccination and at one and six months following vaccination for each season. Sera were tested by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Participants were grouped according to their history of TIV vaccination over four seasons (since 2015/16), with the groups designated as "frequently vaccinated" (≥3 vaccines) and "occasionally vaccinated" (≤2 vaccines). Seroprevalence, geometric mean titer (GMT) and seroconversion rate were compared between the frequently and occasionally vaccinated groups.

resultsA total of 97 healthcare workers (HCWs) were enrolled in the study; 49 HCWs participated in both seasons. Thirty-two (43.2%) and forty-three (59.7%) individuals had ≥3 vaccines since 2015/2016, at recruitment and during the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 influenza seasons, respectively. One month following vaccination, HCWs who had received occasional vaccinations demonstrated a higher prevalence of protective antibodies and a greater GMT for both influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2) viruses. For influenza B Victoria, the frequently vaccinated HCWs demonstrated a higher seroprevalence rate, seroconversion, and GMT.

conclusionsPrevious vaccination can influence the immune response, although without substantially compromising the immunogenicity of annual influenza vaccination. HCW annual influenza vaccination is required to re-establish and maintain the antibody titers against influenza.

Indexed as

antibodiescohort studyfrequently and occasionally vaccinatedinfluenza vaccinevaccination history

Identifiers

PMID39591121
PMCPMC11598577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.