ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2024
Evaluation of the Normal Measurements of Orbital Structures in Healthy Adult Individuals by Using a Magnetic Resonance Imaging Method.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Volumetric reference data of the orbit: a deep learning MRI analysis in the German national cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to determine the normal values of orbital structures according to sex in healthy adults.
methodsDiameters of extraocular muscles, the width of the optic nerve sheath diameter, the length of the inter-zygomatic line, ocular bulb length, and globe position were measured in the T1-weighed MR (magnetic resonance) images in 204 orbits of 102 individuals.
resultsThe mean values of the diameters of the extraocular muscles in males and females were as follows: medial rectus, 3.96 ± 0.52 and 3.58 ± 0.53 mm; lateral rectus, 3.47 ± 0.61 and 3.15 ± 0.48 mm; inferior rectus, 4.47 ± 0.53 and 4.07 ± 0.48 mm; superior rectus, 4.44 ± 0.64 and 4.01 ± 0.56 mm; and superior oblique, 3.68 ± 0.49 and 3.45 ± 0.44 mm. The length of the interzygomatic line in males and females were 102.68 ± 3.89 and 96.95 ± 3.4 mm, the ocular bulb length was 23.33 ± 1.32 and 22.83 ± 1.1 mm, the globe position was 7.66 ± 1.33 and 7.3 ± 1.39 mm, and the width of the optic nerve sheath diameter was 4.65 ± 0.62 and 4.28 ± 0.51 mm, respectively. All measurements were significantly greater for males than for females (
conclusionsWe believe that a practical and quantitative method will be provided by this study for the diagnosis and determination of the normative values of orbital structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.