ArticleMetabolites2024
Analysis of the Urine Volatilome of COVID-19 Patients and the Possible Metabolic Alterations Produced by the Disease.
Article in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trained Scent Dog Detection and GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds from Murine Coronavirus-Infected Cell Cultures.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alterations in metabolism caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection have been highlighted in various investigations and have been used to search for biomarkers in different biological matrices. However, the selected biomarkers vary greatly across studies. Our objective is to provide a robust selection of biomarkers, including results from different sample treatments in the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) present in urine samples from patients with COVID-19. Between September 2021 and May 2022, urine samples were collected from 35 hospitalized COVID-19 patients and 32 healthy controls. The samples were analyzed by headspace (HS) solid phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Analyses were conducted on untreated urine samples and on samples that underwent specific pretreatments: lyophilization and treatment with sulfuric acid. Partial Least Squares Linear Discriminant Analysis (PLS-LDA) and Subwindow Permutation Analysis (SPA) models were established to distinguish patterns between COVID-19 patients and healthy controls. The results identify compounds that are present in different proportions in urine samples from COVID-19 patients compared to those from healthy individuals. Analysis of urine samples using HS-SPME-GC-MS reveals differences between COVID-19 patients and healthy individuals. These differences are more pronounced when methods that enhance VOC formation are used. However, these pretreatments can cause reactions between sample components, creating additional products or removing compounds, so biomarker selection could be altered. Therefore, using a combination of methods may be more informative when evaluating metabolic alterations caused by viral infections and would allow for a better selection of biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.