ArticleJournal of imaging2024
Spatially Localized Visual Perception Estimation by Means of Prosthetic Vision Simulation.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal prosthetic devices aim to repair some vision in visually impaired patients by electrically stimulating neural cells in the visual system. Although there have been several notable advancements in the creation of electrically stimulated small dot-like perceptions, a deeper comprehension of the physical properties of phosphenes is still necessary. This study analyzes the influence of two independent electrode array topologies to achieve single-localized stimulation while the retina is electrically stimulated: a two-dimensional (2D) hexagon-shaped array reported in clinical studies and a patented three-dimensional (3D) linear electrode carrier. For both, cell stimulation is verified in COMSOL Multiphysics by developing a lifelike 3D computational model that includes the relevant retinal interface elements and dynamics of the voltage-gated ionic channels. The evoked percepts previously described in clinical studies using the 2D array are strongly associated with our simulation-based findings, allowing for the development of analytical models of the evoked percepts. Moreover, our findings identify differences between visual sensations induced by the arrays. The 2D array showed drawbacks during stimulation; similarly, the state-of-the-art 2D visual prostheses provide only dot-like visual sensations in close proximity to the electrode. The 3D design could offer a technique for improving cell selectivity because it requires low-intensity threshold activation which results in volumes of stimulation similar to the volume surrounded by a solitary RGC. Our research establishes a proof-of-concept technique for determining the utility of the 3D electrode array for selectively activating individual RGCs at the highest density via small-sized electrodes while maintaining electrochemical safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.