ArticleJournal of imaging2024
An Enhanced Deep Learning Model for Effective Crop Pest and Disease Detection.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformer augmented hybrid deep learning for explainable multi class pest classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Image classification optimization technology based on differentiable neural architecture search improvement model.PloS one · 2025Article
- SH-DETR: Enhancing steel surface defect detection and classification with an improved transformer architecture.PloS one · 2025Article
- PalmNeXt: a ConvNeXt-based deep learning model for pest detection in date palm leaves.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Efficient Convolutional Neural Network Model for the Taxonomy and Sex Identification of Three Phlebotomine Sandfly Species (Diptera, Psychodidae, and Phlebotominae).Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional machine learning methods struggle with plant pest and disease image recognition, particularly when dealing with small sample sizes, indistinct features, and numerous categories. This paper proposes an improved ResNet34 model (ESA-ResNet34) for crop pest and disease detection. The model employs ResNet34 as its backbone and introduces an efficient spatial attention mechanism (effective spatial attention, ESA) to focus on key regions of the images. By replacing the standard convolutions in ResNet34 with depthwise separable convolutions, the model reduces its parameter count by 85.37% and its computational load by 84.51%. Additionally, Dropout is used to mitigate overfitting, and data augmentation techniques such as center cropping and horizontal flipping are employed to enhance the model's robustness. The experimental results show that the improved algorithm achieves an accuracy, precision, and F1 score of 87.09%, 87.14%, and 86.91%, respectively, outperforming several benchmark models (including AlexNet, VGG16, MobileNet, DenseNet, and various ResNet variants). These findings demonstrate that the proposed ESA-ResNet34 model significantly enhances crop pest and disease detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.