Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590729›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2024

Skin Cancer Image Classification Using Artificial Intelligence Strategies: A Systematic Review.

Ricardo Vardasca, Joaquim Gabriel Mendes, Carolina Magalhaes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ricardo VardascaISLA Santarem, Rua Teixeira Guedes 31, 2000-029 Santarem, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4217-2882
Joaquim Gabriel MendesInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4254-1879
Carolina MagalhaesInstituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial, Universidade do Porto, 4099-002 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5602-718X

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/144906/2019Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/50022/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/50022/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing incidence of and resulting deaths associated with malignant skin tumors are a public health problem that can be minimized if detection strategies are improved. Currently, diagnosis is heavily based on physicians' judgment and experience, which can occasionally lead to the worsening of the lesion or needless biopsies. Several non-invasive imaging modalities, e.g., confocal scanning laser microscopy or multiphoton laser scanning microscopy, have been explored for skin cancer assessment, which have been aligned with different artificial intelligence (AI) strategies to assist in the diagnostic task, based on several image features, thus making the process more reliable and faster. This systematic review concerns the implementation of AI methods for skin tumor classification with different imaging modalities, following the PRISMA guidelines. In total, 206 records were retrieved and qualitatively analyzed. Diagnostic potential was found for several techniques, particularly for dermoscopy images, with strategies yielding classification results close to perfection. Learning approaches based on support vector machines and artificial neural networks seem to be preferred, with a recent focus on convolutional neural networks. Still, detailed descriptions of training/testing conditions are lacking in some reports, hampering reproduction. The use of AI methods in skin cancer diagnosis is an expanding field, with future work aiming to construct optimal learning approaches and strategies. Ultimately, early detection could be optimized, improving patient outcomes, even in areas where healthcare is scarce.

Indexed as

classificationimaging methodsmachine learningnon-invasiveskin cancer

Identifiers

PMID39590729
PMCPMC11595075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.