Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590621›Full record

ArticleMembranes2024

Combined Effects of Surface Roughness, Solubility Parameters, and Hydrophilicity on Biofouling of Reverse Osmosis Membranes.

Neveen AlQasas, Daniel Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neveen AlQasasWater Research Center (WRC), Division of Engineering, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 129188, United Arab Emirates.
Daniel JohnsonWater Research Center (WRC), Division of Engineering, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 129188, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-0389

Funding

Tamkeen, viaNew York University Abu Dhabi Faculty Funding AD330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fouling of protein on the surface of reverse osmosis (RO) membranes is a surface phenomenon strongly dependent on the physical and chemical characteristics of both the membrane surface and the foulant molecule. Much of the focus on fouling mitigation is on the synthesis of more hydrophilic membrane materials. However, hydrophilicity is only one of several factors affecting foulant attachment. A more systematic and rationalized methodology is needed to screen the membrane materials for the synthesis of fouling-resistant materials, which will ensure the prevention of the accumulation of foulants on the membrane surfaces, avoiding the trial and error methodology used in most membrane synthesis in the literature. If a clear correlation is found between various membrane surface properties, in combination or singly, and the amount of fouling, this will facilitate the establishment of a systematic strategy of screening materials and enhance the selection of membrane materials and therefore will reflect on the efficiency of the membrane process. In this work, eight commercial reverse osmosis membranes were tested for bovine serum albumin (BSA) protein fouling. The work here focused on three surface membrane properties: the surface roughness, the water contact angle (hydrophilicity), and finally the Hansen solubility parameter (HSP) distance between the foulant understudy (BSA protein) and the membrane surface. The HSP distance was investigated as it represented the affinities of materials to each other, and therefore, it was believed to have an important contribution to the tendency of foulant to stick to the surface of the membrane. The results showed that the surface roughness and the HSP distance contributed to membrane fouling more than the hydrophilicity. We recommend taking into account the HSP distance between the membrane material and foulants when selecting membrane materials.

Indexed as

biofoulingHansen solubility distanceHansen solubility parametermembrane foulingmembrane hydrophilicitymembrane roughness

Identifiers

PMID39590621
PMCPMC11596770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.