Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590580›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2024

AI-Reinforced Wearable Sensors and Intelligent Point-of-Care Tests.

Ghita Yammouri, Abdellatif Ait Lahcen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ghita YammouriChemical Analysis & Biosensors, Process Engineering and Environment Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Techniques, Hassan II University of Casablanca, Mohammedia 28806, Morocco.
Abdellatif Ait LahcenCenter for Bioelectronics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23508, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques offer great potential to advance point-of-care testing (POCT) and wearable sensors for personalized medicine applications. This review explores the recent advances and the transformative potential of the use of AI in improving wearables and POCT. The integration of AI significantly contributes to empowering these tools and enables continuous monitoring, real-time analysis, and rapid diagnostics, thus enhancing patient outcomes and healthcare efficiency. Wearable sensors powered by AI models offer tremendous opportunities for precise and non-invasive tracking of physiological conditions that are essential for early disease detection and personalized treatments. AI-empowered POCT facilitates rapid, accurate diagnostics, making these medical testing kits accessible and available even in resource-limited settings. This review discusses the key advances in AI applications for data processing, sensor fusion, and multivariate analytics, highlighting case examples that exhibit their impact in different medical scenarios. In addition, the challenges associated with data privacy, regulatory approvals, and technology integrations into the existing healthcare system have been overviewed. The outlook emphasizes the urgent need for continued innovation in AI-driven health technologies to overcome these challenges and to fully achieve the potential of these techniques to revolutionize personalized medicine.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiosensorsdeep learningpersonalized medicinepoint-of-care testingwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID39590580
PMCPMC11595538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.