ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2024
A Scoping Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Identification and Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal AI in Cardiac Arrhythmia: From Pattern Recognition to Mechanistic Insight.Clinical cardiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Medicine: A Giant Step in Personalized Medicine?Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in atrial fibrillation: emerging applications, research directions and ethical considerations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveAtrial fibrillation [AF] is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and significantly increases the risk of stroke, peripheral embolism, and mortality. With the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence [AI] technologies, there is growing potential to enhance the tools used in AF detection and diagnosis. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the current knowledge on the application of AI, particularly machine learning [ML], in identifying and diagnosing AF in clinical settings.
methodsFollowing the PRISMA ScR guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted using the MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases, targeting studies involving AI, cardiology, and diagnostic tools. Precisely 2635 articles were initially identified. After duplicate removal and detailed evaluation of titles, abstracts, and full texts, 30 studies were selected for review. Additional relevant studies were included to enrich the analysis.
resultsAI models, especially ML-based models, are increasingly used to optimize AF diagnosis. Deep learning, a subset of ML, has demonstrated superior performance by automatically extracting features from large datasets without manual intervention. Self-learning algorithms have been trained using diverse data, such as signals from 12-lead and single-lead electrocardiograms, and photoplethysmography, providing accurate AF detection across various modalities.
conclusionsAI-based models, particularly those utilizing deep learning, offer faster and more accurate diagnostic capabilities than traditional methods with equal or superior reliability. Ongoing research is further enhancing these algorithms using larger datasets to improve AF detection and management in clinical practice. These advancements hold promise for significantly improving the early diagnosis and treatment of AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.