ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2024
Finite Element Combined Design and Material Optimization Addressing the Wear in Removable Implant Prosthodontics.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomechanical Evaluation of CAD/CAM Inlay Restorations Through Experimental Flexural Strength Testing and Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Combining 3D Multi-Object Reconstruction with Finite Element Analysis for Accurate Dental Modelling and Restoration.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Effects of Platform Diameter and Screw Length in an Abutment-Free Tissue-Level Implant System Compared with a Ti-Base Configuration: 3D Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- Finite element analysis (FEA) of the stress behavior of some dental materials.Journal of medicine and life · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wear at the male-female interface of retentive elements in implant-supported removable prostheses is the most frequent complication in such applications. The lack of an ideal/optimal insertion path, as well as the fabrication inaccuracies, are the primary contributors to this issue. A male attachment with a common ball anchor enhanced by lateral flexibility was investigated as a solution, compared to the widely used rigid ball anchor design. A parametric finite element analysis was performed to compare the wear-inducing maximum strain at the female polymer counterpart by various attachment designs made from titanium and Nitinol. The evolution of mechanical strains causing wear in the female part, as well as the contribution of stresses and martensitic transformation in the implant's flexible shaft, were evaluated under several insertion misfit scenarios. Results indicate that introducing a long flexible shaft in the titanium implant reduced maximum strains in the female attachment part by up to 61% as compared to the solid ball anchor. Further improvement was observed by using the shape memory alloy Nitinol as shaft material, leading to a minor reduction in stress and strain at the contact surface but allowing for a shorter abutment. Finally, the optimized Nitinol implant design with a short, necked flexible shaft promoting martensitic transformation at low plateau stress resulted in an approximate 90% reduction in maximum strains at the inner surface of the female part during manual insertion, which indicates a significantly reduced wear phenomenon at the contact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.