ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2024
The Impact of Helium and Nitrogen Plasmas on Electrospun Gelatin Nanofiber Scaffolds for Skin Tissue Engineering Applications.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Characterization of Solution-Cast Polycaprolactone/MXene/Gelatin Composite Films for Biomedical Applications.Biopolymers · 2026Article
- Enhancing Biocompatibility and Biophysical Properties of Three-Dimensional Collagen Scaffolds Using Nonthermal Plasma Treatment.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the fabrication of tannic acid-crosslinked gelatin nanofibers via electrospinning, followed by helium and nitrogen plasma treatment to enhance their biofunctionality, which was assessed using fibroblast cells. The nanofibers were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and water contact angle measurements before and after treatment. Helium and nitrogen gas plasma were employed to modify the nanofiber surfaces. Results indicated that helium and nitrogen plasma treatment significantly increased the hydrophilicity and biofunctionality of the nanofibers by 5.1° ± 0.6 and 15.6° ± 2.2, respectively, making them more suitable for human skin fibroblast applications. To investigate the impact of plasma treatment on gelatin, we employed a computational model using density functional theory with the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) method. This model represented gelatin as an amino acid chain composed of glycine, hydroxyproline, and proline, interacting with plasma particles. Vibrational analysis of these systems was used to interpret the vibrational spectra of untreated and plasma-treated gelatin. To further correlate with experimental findings, molecular dynamics simulations were performed on a system of three interacting gelatin chains. These simulations explored changes in amino acid bonding. The computational results align with experimental observations. Comprehensive analyses confirmed that these treatments improved hydrophilicity and biofunctionality, supporting the use of plasma-treated gelatin nanofibers in skin tissue engineering applications. Gelatin's natural biopolymer properties and the versatility of plasma surface modification techniques underscore its potential in regenerating cartilage, skin, circulatory tissues, and hamstrings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.