Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590528›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2024

Unlocking Genome Editing: Advances and Obstacles in CRISPR/Cas Delivery Technologies.

Bibifatima Kaupbayeva, Andrey Tsoy, Yuliya Safarova Yantsen, Ainetta Nurmagambetova, Hironobu Murata, Krzysztof Matyjaszewski, Sholpan Askarova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Nanocarrier-mediated CRISPR-Cas delivery: a novel approach against antibiotic-resistant superbugs.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Functional Biomaterials: Scaffolds for Innovative Treatments.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bibifatima KaupbayevaCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Andrey TsoyCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3818-3079
Yuliya Safarova YantsenCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-0695-0413
Ainetta NurmagambetovaSchool of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 020000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-8882-5546
Hironobu MurataChemistry Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9040-214X
Krzysztof MatyjaszewskiChemistry Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1960-3402
Sholpan AskarovaCenter for Life Sciences, National Laboratory Astana, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-6161-1671

Funding

Kazakhstan MSHE AP14871448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats associated with protein 9) was first identified as a component of the bacterial adaptive immune system and subsequently engineered into a genome-editing tool. The key breakthrough in this field came with the realization that CRISPR/Cas9 could be used in mammalian cells to enable transformative genetic editing. This technology has since become a vital tool for various genetic manipulations, including gene knockouts, knock-in point mutations, and gene regulation at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. CRISPR/Cas9 holds great potential in human medicine, particularly for curing genetic disorders. However, despite significant innovation and advancement in genome editing, the technology still possesses critical limitations, such as off-target effects, immunogenicity issues, ethical considerations, regulatory hurdles, and the need for efficient delivery methods. To overcome these obstacles, efforts have focused on creating more accurate and reliable Cas9 nucleases and exploring innovative delivery methods. Recently, functional biomaterials and synthetic carriers have shown great potential as effective delivery vehicles for CRISPR/Cas9 components. In this review, we attempt to provide a comprehensive survey of the existing CRISPR-Cas9 delivery strategies, including viral delivery, biomaterials-based delivery, synthetic carriers, and physical delivery techniques. We underscore the urgent need for effective delivery systems to fully unlock the power of CRISPR/Cas9 technology and realize a seamless transition from benchtop research to clinical applications.

Indexed as

cell-penetrating peptidesCRISPR/Cas9delivery strategiesfunctional biomaterialsgenome editinglipid nanoparticlessynthetic polymers

Identifiers

PMID39590528
PMCPMC11595195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.