Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590346›Full record

ReviewCurrent issues in molecular biology2024

Intraosseous Delivery of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatment of Bone and Hematological Diseases.

Mikhail Yu Artamonov, Evgeniy L Sokov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mikhail Yu ArtamonovPenn Medicine Princeton Health, Plainsboro, NJ 08536, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8666-4398
Evgeniy L SokovDepartment of Algology and Rehabilitation, Peoples' Friendship University, Moscow 117198, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal stem cells are used most in regenerative medicine due to their capacities in differentiation and immune modulation. The intraosseous injection of MSC into the bone has been recommended because of expected outcomes for retention, bioavailability, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy, particularly in conditions involving the bone, such as osteoporosis and osteonecrosis. A review of the intraosseous delivery of mesenchymal stem cells in comparison with intravenous and intra-arterial delivery methods will be subjected to critical examination. This delivery mode fares better regarding paracrine signaling and immunomodulation attributes, which are the cornerstone of tissue regeneration and inflammation reduction. The local complications and technical challenges still apply with this method. This study was more focused on further research soon to be conducted to further elucidate long-term safety and efficacy of intraosseous mesenchymal stem cell therapy. Though much has been achieved with very impressive progress in this field, it is worth noting that more studies need to be put into place so that this technique can be established as a routine approach, especially with further research in biomaterials, gene therapy, and personalized medicine.

Indexed as

bone marrow nichebone-related disordersimmunomodulationintraosseous deliverymesenchymal stem cells (MSC)MSC retentionosteogenesisregenerative medicinetissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID39590346
PMCPMC11592824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.