ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Application of Real-Time Palm Imaging with Nelder-Mead Particle Swarm Optimization/Regression Algorithms for Non-Contact Blood Pressure Detection.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to the rising prevalence of hypertension due to lifestyle changes, this study introduces a novel approach for non-contact blood pressure (BP) monitoring. Recognizing the "silent killer" nature of hypertension, this research focuses on developing accessible, non-invasive BP measurement methods. This study compares two distinct non-contact BP measurement approaches: one combining the Nelder-Mead simplex method with particle swarm optimization (NM-PSO) and the other using machine learning regression analysis. In the NM-PSO method, a standard webcam captures continuous images of the palm, extracting physiological data through light wave reflection and employing independent component analysis (ICA) to remove noise artifacts. The NM-PSO achieves a verified root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.71 mmHg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) and 3.42 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Alternatively, the regression method derives BP values through machine learning-based regression formulas, resulting in an RMSE of 2.88 mmHg for SBP and 2.60 mmHg for DBP. Both methods enable fast, accurate, and convenient BP measurement within 10 s, suitable for home use. This study demonstrates a cost-effective solution for non-contact BP monitoring and highlights each method's advantages. The NM-PSO approach emphasizes optimization in noise handling, while the regression method leverages formulaic efficiency in BP estimation. These results offer a biomimetic approach that could replace traditional contact-based BP measurement devices, contributing to enhanced accessibility in hypertension management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.