Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590204›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024

Sternal Wound Reconstruction Following Deep Sternal Wound Infection: Past, Present and Future: A Literature Review.

Arwa Khashkhusha, Sundas Butt, Mariam Abdelghaffar, William Wang, Asveny Rajananthanan, Sakshi Roy, Bakht Noor Khurshid, Mohamed Zeinah, Amer Harky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Surgically Managed Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Heart Transplantation.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arwa KhashkhushaSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health and Life Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5TR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7407-8404
Sundas ButtDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0519-0715
Mariam AbdelghaffarSchool of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Building No. 2441, Road 2835, Busaiteen 228, Muharraq P.O. Box 15503, Bahrain.
William WangBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 2AD, UK.
Asveny RajananthananNorthampton General Hospital, Northampton NN1 5BD, UK.
Sakshi RoySchool of Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3519-9318
Bakht Noor KhurshidDepartment of Medicine, University Medical & Dental College (UMDC), Sargodha Rd, University Town, Faisalabad 38000, Punjab, Pakistan.
Mohamed ZeinahFaculty of Medicine, Ain Sham University, Cairo 11566, Egypt.
Amer HarkyDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Liverpool L14 3PE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This literature review critically examines the historical, current, and prospective dimensions of sternal wound reconstruction in the specific context of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), aiming to enhance patient outcomes and optimise surgical techniques. Preventive measures, including prophylactic antibiotic administration and surgical site preparation, are crucial in reducing the incidence of DSWI. Effective management necessitates a multidisciplinary approach encompassing surgical debridement, drainage, and sternum repair utilising diverse procedures in conjunction with antibiotic therapy. Traditional approaches to managing DSWI involved closed irrigation and drainage techniques. While these methods exhibited certain advantages, they also exhibited limitations and varying degrees of success. The current care paradigms emphasise prophylactic antibiotic administration and surgical interventions like closed suction and irrigation, vacuum-assisted closure, and flap reconstruction. Future advancements in surgical techniques and technology hold promise for further enhancing sternal wound reconstruction. This review separates and emphasises the distinct roles of prophylaxis, antibiotic treatment, and reconstructive techniques, each relevant specifically to DSWI management. Collaborative efforts between cardiac and plastic surgeons, supported by ongoing research and innovation, are indispensable to advance sternal wound restoration and achieve superior outcomes in terms of patient welfare, morbidity and mortality reduction, and surgical efficacy.

Indexed as

deep sternal wound reconstructionflapsinfectionmultidisciplinary teamplastic surgeryreconstructionsurgical interventionwound infection

Identifiers

PMID39590204
PMCPMC11595137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.