ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024
Sternal Wound Reconstruction Following Deep Sternal Wound Infection: Past, Present and Future: A Literature Review.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intradermal Application of Allogenic Wharton's Jelly Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Chronic Post-Thoracotomy Wound in an Elderly Patient After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Clinical Case with Brief Literature Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- When Rewiring Fails-The Enduring Role of the Pectoralis Major Flap in Sternal Wound Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Clinical efficacy of multidisciplinary team collaboration in the treatment of deep sternal wound infection].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Article
- Immunonutritional Markers and the Protective Role of Sternal Irrigation and Antibiotic-Impregnated Membranes in Sternal Wound Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Surgically Managed Deep Sternal Wound Infection After Heart Transplantation.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This literature review critically examines the historical, current, and prospective dimensions of sternal wound reconstruction in the specific context of deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), aiming to enhance patient outcomes and optimise surgical techniques. Preventive measures, including prophylactic antibiotic administration and surgical site preparation, are crucial in reducing the incidence of DSWI. Effective management necessitates a multidisciplinary approach encompassing surgical debridement, drainage, and sternum repair utilising diverse procedures in conjunction with antibiotic therapy. Traditional approaches to managing DSWI involved closed irrigation and drainage techniques. While these methods exhibited certain advantages, they also exhibited limitations and varying degrees of success. The current care paradigms emphasise prophylactic antibiotic administration and surgical interventions like closed suction and irrigation, vacuum-assisted closure, and flap reconstruction. Future advancements in surgical techniques and technology hold promise for further enhancing sternal wound reconstruction. This review separates and emphasises the distinct roles of prophylaxis, antibiotic treatment, and reconstructive techniques, each relevant specifically to DSWI management. Collaborative efforts between cardiac and plastic surgeons, supported by ongoing research and innovation, are indispensable to advance sternal wound restoration and achieve superior outcomes in terms of patient welfare, morbidity and mortality reduction, and surgical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.