Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590194›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024

Effects of Respiratory Muscle Training Pre- and Post-Cardiac Surgery in Adults: A Scoping Review.

Giulia Starko, Daniel Müller, Antoine Lipka, Patrick Feiereisen, Camilo Corbellini, Raphael Martins de Abreu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giulia StarkoDepartment of Health, LUNEX University of Applied Sciences, 4671 Differdange, Luxembourg.
Daniel MüllerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Antoine LipkaDepartment of Health, LUNEX University of Applied Sciences, 4671 Differdange, Luxembourg.
Patrick FeiereisenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, 1210 Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0001-5745-0297
Camilo CorbelliniDepartment of Health, LUNEX University of Applied Sciences, 4671 Differdange, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-7476-9301
Raphael Martins de AbreuDepartment of Health, LUNEX University of Applied Sciences, 4671 Differdange, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-3130-101X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) and cardiac valve replacement surgeries (CVRSs) are common lifesaving cardiac surgeries. They are linked to an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). This review scopes the effects of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on adult patients, considering mainly exercise capacity, lung function, and the occurrence of PPCs.

methodsThis scoping review was built using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Four databases were searched in May 2024. Three reviewers independently screened the articles. The data were extracted and summarised in text and tables.

resultsFive studies were included in the final analysis, where IMT was compared to sham or placebo IMT, and some studies added an exercise program to both groups. PeakVO

conclusionsIMT can be a non-conventional training method to prevent respiratory muscle weakness. It can be applied in pre- or post-surgical contexts, potentially affecting exercise capacity and quality of life in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Indexed as

cardiac prehabilitationcardiac therapycardiologycomplicationsrespiratory muscle training

Identifiers

PMID39590194
PMCPMC11594498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.