Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590193›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2024

Validity and Reliability of Self-Reported Prevalent and Incident Cardiovascular Disease Among Asian Adults.

Charumathi Sabanayagam, Feng He, Miao Li Chee, Ching-Yu Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charumathi SabanayagamSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4042-4719
Feng HeSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Miao Li CheeSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.
Ching-Yu ChengSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore 169856, Singapore.

Funding

National Medical Research Council (SG) NMRC/HCSAINV/MOH-001019-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in Asians. We aimed to examine the validity and reliability of self-reported (SR) CVD in 6762 Chinese, Malay, and Indian adults aged 40-80 years who attended the baseline (November 2004) and 6-year follow-up visit (2011-2017) of a population-based cohort study in Singapore. CVD was defined based on the presence of existing (prevalent) or new onset (incident) cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or stroke. The validity of SR-CVD was assessed by comparing it against diagnosed CVD using sensitivity and specificity. The reliability of SR-CVD was evaluated by calculating the percentage of positive agreement between baseline and follow-up visits. The sensitivity and specificity of SR-CVD were 62.7% and 93.8% for prevalent SR-CVD and 50.9% and 98.5% for incident SR-CVD. The negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.1% for both prevalent and incident SR-CVD. The reliability of positive self-reports between the baseline and follow-up was substantial, at 85%. The excellent specificity and NPV of SR-CVD suggest that it could serve as a valuable tool for excluding AMI and stroke. However, its moderate sensitivity suggests that positive SR-CVD reports should prompt further clinical evaluation to prevent potential false positives.

Indexed as

accuracyacute myocardial infarctionincident CVDprevalent CVDself-reportstroke

Identifiers

PMID39590193
PMCPMC11594894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.