Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590177›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Fostering the Conversation About Complementary Medicine: Acceptability and Usefulness of Two Communication-Supporting Tools for Patients with Cancer.

Marit Mentink, Janneke Noordman, Anja Timmer-Bonte, Martine Busch, Sandra van Dulmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marit MentinkDepartment of Communication in Healthcare, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-9665
Janneke NoordmanDepartment of Communication in Healthcare, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anja Timmer-BonteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-1571-5611
Martine BuschVan Praag Institute, Springweg 7, 3511 VH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenDepartment of Communication in Healthcare, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-7544

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society 12566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both patients and providers experience barriers to discussing complementary medicine during oncology consultations. This study describes the development of two communication tools-a question prompt sheet and a visual slideshow-and aims to evaluate their acceptability, perceived usefulness, and intention to use among patients with cancer. Nine (former) patients with breast cancer were involved in the development of the tools as co-researchers. The 15-item evaluation questionnaire was completed by 144 participants recruited from three Dutch hospitals, a patient panel, and the Dutch Breast Cancer Society. The tools' content and layout were generally acceptable, although suggestions were made to include items on exercise and diet in the question prompt sheet. About half of the participants found the tools useful, while the other half felt they were unnecessary, either because they could already discuss complementary medicine with their healthcare provider or had no interest in the topic. The tools were considered particularly helpful for fellow patients. The tools were well received though minor modifications were suggested. The lack of perceived need by half of the participants may have influenced the results. For effective use of the tools, it is important to identify patients who need extra support in discussing complementary medicine.

Indexed as

CommunicationComplementary TherapiesAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and Questionnairesacceptabilitycancercomplementary medicineoncologypatient–provider communicationtoolsusefulness

Identifiers

PMID39590177
PMCPMC11592416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.