Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590163›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Guidance for Canadian Breast Cancer Practice: National Consensus Recommendations for Clinical Staging of Patients Newly Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

Jeffrey Q Cao, Brae Surgeoner, Mita Manna, Jean-François Boileau, Karen A Gelmon, Muriel Brackstone, Christine Brezden-Masley, Katarzyna J Jerzak, Ipshita Prakash, Sandeep Sehdev and 7 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jeffrey Q CaoArthur Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 5G2, Canada.
Brae SurgeonerAlberta Health Service, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3, Canada.
Mita MannaSaskatoon Cancer Centre, Saskatoon, SK S7N 4H4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4344-7913
Jean-François BoileauJewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.
Karen A GelmonDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4111-2757
Muriel BrackstoneLondon Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7741-2199
Christine Brezden-MasleyMount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4818-318X
Katarzyna J JerzakSunnybrook Health Sciences, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Ipshita PrakashJewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0730-5363
Sandeep SehdevThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7434-2263
Stephanie M WongMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
Nathaniel BouganimMcGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
David W CesconPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-0998
Stephen ChiaBC Cancer-Vancouver, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.
Ian S DayesJuravinski Cancer Center, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8V 5C2, Canada.
Anil Abraham JoyCross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Jan-Willem HenningArthur Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB T2N 5G2, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-5768-6379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate staging of breast cancer is fundamental for guiding treatment decisions and predicting patient outcomes. However, there can be considerable variation in routine clinical practice based on individual interpretation of guidelines and depending on the healthcare provider initially involved in working up patients newly diagnosed with breast cancer, ranging from primary care providers, triage nurses, surgeons, and/or oncologists. The optimal approach for clinical staging, particularly in asymptomatic patients presenting with intermediate-risk disease, remains a topic of dialogue among clinicians. Given this area of uncertainty, the Research Excellence, Active Leadership (REAL) Canadian Breast Cancer Alliance conducted a modified Delphi process to assess the level of agreement among Canadian expert clinicians on various staging recommendations. In total, 20 items were drafted covering staging based on biological status, the utilization of localization clips, both for the axilla during diagnosis and primary surgical site for margins and radiation therapy planning, and the use of advanced imaging for the investigation of distant metastases. Overall, the consensus threshold among all participants (i.e., ≥75% agreement) was reached in 20/20 items. Differences in clinical practice and recent findings from the literature are provided in the discussion. These consensus recommendations are meant to help standardize breast cancer staging practices in Canada, ensuring accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment planning.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsConsensusNeoplasm StagingCanadaDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as Topicbreast cancerREAL Alliancerecommendationsstaging

Identifiers

PMID39590163
PMCPMC11592626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.