ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024
Soft Tissue Reconstruction and Integration to Implant After Bone-Tumor Resection: A Current Concept Review.
Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Region-Specific Biomimetic Prosthesis for Enhancing Heterogeneous Double-Interface Integration of Bone-Prosthesis and Tendon-Prosthesis.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Megaprosthetic Reconstruction for Pathological Proximal Humerus Fractures: Infection Rates, Prevention Strategies, and Functional Outcomes-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Soft tissue reconstruction using Trevira tube following proximal femur resection and tumorous endoprosthetic replacement.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- T-PRP-DAT Gel: A Novel Material Promotes Adipose Tissue Regeneration.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWith the advancements in chemotherapy for malignant bone tumors, the number of patients eligible for limb salvage surgery has increased. Surgeons face a subsequent challenge in limb-sparing resection due to the need for reconstructing soft tissue coverage. The aim of this review is to focus on the present state of the field in these areas, highlighting recent advancements.
methodsA literature research was conducted using keywords such as "soft tissue", "integration", "reconstruction", "megaprosthesis", and "soft tissue coverage", on different databases, and following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) criteria, a total of 35 studies were selected.
resultsIn recent times, there has been a growing emphasis on different techniques such mesh application, allograft-prosthesis composites, allograft reconstruction, a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) tube, prosthesis itself and certain metals utilized for implant coatings are used in soft tissue reconstruction.
conclusionWhile tissue-engineered constructs and advancements in biological and cellular approaches have shown potential for enhancing osseointegration and interactions with soft tissues and implants, the actual clinical outcomes have frequently fallen short of expectations. The success of soft tissue integration is crucial for achieving functional outcomes, minimizing complications, and ensuring the long-term stability of orthopedic implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.