Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590142›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

The Evolving Molecular Landscape and Actionable Alterations in Urologic Cancers.

Ryan Michael Antar, Christopher Fawaz, Diego Gonzalez, Vincent Eric Xu, Arthur Pierre Drouaud, Jason Krastein, Faozia Pio, Andeulazia Murdock, Kirolos Youssef, Stanislav Sobol and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ryan Michael AntarDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0947-407X
Christopher FawazDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-4621-3743
Diego GonzalezDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-2647-4848
Vincent Eric XuDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-4824
Arthur Pierre DrouaudDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2240-6875
Jason KrasteinDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-1028
Faozia PioDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7567-9974
Andeulazia MurdockDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-1922-073X
Kirolos YoussefDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Stanislav SobolDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.
Michael J WhalenDepartment of Urology, The George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, DC 20052, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2423-072X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic landscape of urologic cancers has evolved with the identification of actionable mutations that impact diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies. This narrative review consolidates existing literature on genetic mutations across key urologic cancers, including bladder, renal, prostate, upper tract urothelial, testicular, and penile. The review highlights mutations in DNA damage repair genes, such as BRCA1/2 and PTEN, as well as pathway alterations like FGFR and PD-L1 overexpression. These mutations influence tumor behavior and therapeutic outcomes, emphasizing the need for precision oncology approaches. Molecular profiling, through tools like next-generation sequencing, has revolutionized patient care by enabling targeted treatment strategies, especially in cancers with distinct molecular subtypes such as luminal or basal bladder cancer and clear cell renal carcinoma. Emerging therapies, including FGFR inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade, offer new treatment avenues, although resistance mechanisms remain a challenge. We also emphasize the importance of biomarker identification for personalized management, especially in metastatic settings where treatment intensification is often required. Future research is needed to further elucidate our understanding of the genetics affecting urologic cancers, which will help develop novel, individualized therapies to enhance oncologic outcomes.

Indexed as

Urologic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansMutationPrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumorbladdergenetic mutationsgenitourinarymolecular alterationspenileprostaterenal cell carcinomatesticularurologic cancersurology

Identifiers

PMID39590142
PMCPMC11593205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.