Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590117›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Predicting Breast Cancer Relapse from Histopathological Images with Ensemble Machine Learning Models.

Ghanashyam Sahoo, Ajit Kumar Nayak, Pradyumna Kumar Tripathy, Amrutanshu Panigrahi, Abhilash Pati, Bibhuprasad Sahu, Chandrakanta Mahanty, Saurav Mallik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prediction ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ghanashyam SahooDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2094-7977
Ajit Kumar NayakDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India.
Pradyumna Kumar TripathyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Silicon University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9788-1013
Amrutanshu PanigrahiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India.
Abhilash PatiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Bhubaneswar 751030, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3418-4202
Bibhuprasad SahuDepartment of Information Technology, Vardhaman College of Engineering (Autonomous), Hyderabad 501218, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-9312
Chandrakanta MahantyDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, GITAM Deemed to Be University, Visakhapatnam 530045, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3084-308X
Saurav MallikDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4107-6784

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relapse and metastasis occur in 30-40% of breast cancer patients, even after targeted treatments like trastuzumab for HER2-positive breast cancer. Accurate individual prognosis is essential for determining appropriate adjuvant treatment and early intervention. This study aims to enhance relapse and metastasis prediction using an innovative framework with machine learning (ML) and ensemble learning (EL) techniques. The developed framework is analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data, which has 123 HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Our two-stage experimental approach first applied six basic ML models (support vector machine, logistic regression, decision tree, random forest, adaptive boosting, and extreme gradient boosting) and then ensembled these models using weighted averaging, soft voting, and hard voting techniques. The weighted averaging ensemble approach achieved enhanced performances of 88.46% accuracy, 89.74% precision, 94.59% sensitivity, 73.33% specificity, 92.11% F-Value, 71.07% Mathew's correlation coefficient, and an AUC of 0.903. This framework enables the accurate prediction of relapse and metastasis in HER2-positive breast cancer patients using H&E images and clinical data, thereby assisting in better treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalFemaleHumansMiddle Agedbreast cancer relapsecancer diagnosisensemble learninghistopathological imagesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39590117
PMCPMC11592466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.