Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39590066›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Gel Cleaning in Heritage: Comparison of the Water Release among Gels and Traditional Pads.

Antonio Sansonetti, Cristiano Riminesi, Sónia Mironiouk, Noemi Proietti, Valeria Di Tullio, Roberto Nisticò, Barbara Sacchi, Carmen Canevali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Antonio SansonettiInstitute for Heritage Science, National Research Council, ISPC-CNR Milan Unit, 20154 Milan, Italy.
Cristiano RiminesiInstitute for Heritage Science, National Research Council, ISPC-CNR Milan Unit, 20154 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9419-3653
Sónia MironioukEscola Superior de Conservació i Restauració de Béns Culturals de Catalunya (ESCRBCC), 08033 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0008-2664-4492
Noemi ProiettiInstitute for Heritage Science, National Research Council, ISPC-CNR Milan Unit, 20154 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3300-9322
Valeria Di TullioInstitute for Heritage Science, National Research Council, ISPC-CNR Milan Unit, 20154 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9574-2570
Roberto NisticòDepartment of Materials Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, INSTM, Via R. Cozzi 55, 20125 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8986-5542
Barbara SacchiInstitute for Heritage Science, National Research Council, ISPC-CNR Milan Unit, 20154 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1081-8909
Carmen CanevaliDepartment of Materials Science, University of Milano-Bicocca, INSTM, Via R. Cozzi 55, 20125 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0897-5876

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water release is a crucial aspect when considering cleaning effects on water-sensitive materials. In conservation practice, a water-based cleaning method which limits water release is very often needed. Unfortunately, this is not accompanied by an appropriate measure of the effectively released water. In this paper, water release has been measured by comparing traditional cleaning formulations, such as paper pulp and sepiolite, with several gar gel formulations, used by both Italian and European conservators. The assessment has been carried out by the gravimetric method, using three different stone material specimens as reference: Noto calcarenite, Manciano sandstone and Black Bergamo limestone, whose porosity values and distributions are known. Moreover, water distribution has been evaluated by portable NMR tests. Different commercial agar gel products (Bresciani, CTS, Sigma), having different concentrations (3, 4, and 5%), application modes (rigid at room T or fluid warm gels, with and without inserting Japanese tissue paper), and geometry (horizontal in gravity force direction or vertical), have been compared to obtain a full scenario among different water release mechanisms present in real conservation works. The paper faces the important issue of preparing reproducible chemical or water pads as well, useful for further research aimed at comparing cleaning effects in heritage conservation. The most interesting quantitative results can be summarized as follows. The water release measured from paper pulp and sepiolite was found to be 2 to 4 times higher than from any tested agar gel. Water release decreases by increasing agar concentration; an increase in the agar concentration by 1% induces a decrease in water release in the range 16.98-66.88 g depending on the stone; the increase from 4% to 5% is more obvious with respect to that from 3% to 4%. It is possible to assess the effect of the presence of Japanese paper, which is able to reduce the water release from 18 to 76%, depending on the stone and on the agar used. The gravimetric results were also used in the preliminary calibration tests of a contact probe named System Unit Salinity Index (SUSI), recently patented and useful in providing humidity and salinity indexes in a given porous material.

Indexed as

agar gelgel cleaninggravimetryheritagewater releasewater-sensitive materials

Identifiers

PMID39590066
PMCPMC11593344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.