ArticleImmunotherapy2024
Identifying risk factors and biomarkers for severe CIP in lung cancer patients- a retrospective case series study.
Article in Immunotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic Impact of Body Mass index in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Bridging FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and Clinical Practice: Comprehensive Characterization of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Toxicities in Geriatric Lung Cancer Patients.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy, but they can induce immune-related adverse events, including immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pneumonia (CIP), a severe lung complication. CIP, particularly Grades 3-4, is associated with poor prognosis, indicating a critical need for research on this issue. Our study aimed to investigate the risk factors and biomarkers associated with severe CIP in lung cancer patients treated with ICIs, where OS represents overall survival and PFS denotes progression-free survival.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 106 lung cancer patients with CIP at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University from 2019 to 2023, categorized into four severity grades.
resultsThe median time to onset of CIP was 5.17 months. Patients with Grade 3-4 CIP had a median PFS of 6.5 months and OS of 11.2 months. Univariate analysis identified phosphocreatine kinase below 61.5 U/l, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) below 1.96, and BMI below 21.26 as predictive factors for Grades 3-4 CIP. Multivariate analysis confirmed that a decreased FVC was a significant predictor.
conclusionsA decreased FVC below 1.96 emerged as a predictive factor for Grades 3-4 CIP, highlighting the importance of monitoring FVC in patients receiving ICIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.