ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2024
Evaluation of CDK4/6 inhibitors in first-line in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to compare the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in two groups of patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: those with symptomatic, high tumor burden disease and those with asymptomatic disease. DESIGN AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 193 patients who received either ribociclib or palbociclib in combination with first-line ET. Patients were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups and compared regarding baseline characteristics and progression-free survivals (PFS).
resultsSymptomatic patients had a significantly shorter mPFS than asymptomatic patients (22.7 months vs. 35.0 months,
conclusionOur analysis revealed that although symptomatic individuals who underwent CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET experienced a significant reduction in mPFS durations compared to asymptomatic patients, the 22-month mPFS indicated that CDK4/6 inhibitor plus ET is an effective treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.