ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025
An innovative approach to the multidisciplinary treatment of uninsured breast cancer patients.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA significant proportion of many populations remain uninsured. The aim of the study was to assess differences in breast cancer outcomes before and after the implementation of an innovative approach to the multidisciplinary treatment of uninsured breast cancer patients.
methodsRetrospective review was performed of patients seen at a safety net hospital from January 2000 to December 2020. Beginning July 2006, an innovative approach was implemented to lower patient costs and facilitate care of uninsured patients.
resultsThe study included 1,797 patients, 661 patients before the changes (BCS), and 1136 patients after implementation of the new cost saving approach (ACS). The mean age was 53 years. The majority were uninsured (56%) or insured by Medicaid (31%). Only 18% underwent screening mammography. The ACS group had a higher rate of breast conservation (75% vs 47%, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of the ACS group received adjuvant therapy: Chemotherapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), Radiation therapy (91% vs 70%, p < 0.001), and initiated endocrine therapy (87% vs 67%, p < 0.001). After follow-up of 8 years, these changes resulted in lower ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (2% vs 16%, p < 0.001) and chest wall recurrence (5% versus 8%) and improvement in overall survival (90% vs 81%, p < 0.001).
conclusionPeer-reviewed literature is replete of studies documenting disparities in breast cancer treatment. The current study describes a successful cost-limiting method which takes advantage of existing financial assistance programs to improve care in uninsured patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589718What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.