ReviewAdvances in neurobiology2024
Determination of Neuronal Activity and Its Meaning for the Processes of Learning and Memory.
Review in Advances in neurobiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical learning creates invariant schema within plastic neural networks.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Eye Gaze Entropy Reflects Individual Experience in the Context of Driving.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An invariant schema emerges within a neural network during hierarchical learning of visual boundaries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the years of studies in the field of systems neuroscience, the functions of neural circuits and behavior-related systems are still not entirely understood. The systems description of brain activity has recently been associated with cognitive concepts, e.g., a cognitive map, reconstructed via place-cell activity analysis and the like, and a cognitive schema, modeled in consolidation research. The issue we find of importance is that cognitive concepts reconstructed in neuroscience research are mainly formulated in terms of the environment. In this chapter, we present the idea of an element of individual experience that serves as a model of behavioral interaction with the environment, rather than a model of the environment itself. This intangible difference entails the need for substantial revision of several well-known phenomena, including long-term potentiation. The principal questions we address are: how do elements of experience appear and change during learning and performance; and how do the links between these elements create the whole structure of individual experience? We argue that learning and memory research need a clear distinction between processes that provide the emergence of new elements of experience (functional systems) and processes underlying the retrieval and/or changes in the existing experience. We propose to view the activity of a neuron as an "action" directed to the future adaptive "microresult," essential for meeting its metabolic needs. This anticipatory neuronal activity is coordinated with the activity of many other cells of the body in the organism-wide functional system, ensuring the achievement of an adaptive "macroresult" at the behavioral level. From this perspective, the mechanisms of learning are considered as the formation of functional systems, and memory is considered as a dynamic structure constituted by systems formed at different stages of individual development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.