Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39589680›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2025

Information Sharing to Enhance Early Childhood Services.

Deborah G Badawi, Otonyemiete Georgewill, Felicia Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deborah G BadawiDivision of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 W. Lombard St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. dbadawi@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7820-0182
Otonyemiete GeorgewillMaryland Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics, 1211 Cathedral St., Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Felicia JonesMaryland Family Network, 1001 Eastern Ave., Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate stakeholder willingness to share information among various social service providers, and to determine perceived barriers to accessing these services in our state. DESCRIPTION: The Maryland Family Network and the Maryland Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics partnered to collect information on family information sharing preferences and barriers to services. We received 22 Survey Monkey responses and had 41 focus group participants aged 25 to 44 years and all regions of the state were represented. Nearly half of participants were Black or African American and participants indicated a broad range of family income. ASSESSMENT: Most participants were a part of multiple assistance programs and were comfortable with all their information being shared, except their social security number. One third of participants noted they did not face barriers to accessing services. The other two thirds noted confusing applications, technology limitations and the need for self-advocacy as significant barriers.

conclusionFamilies are very comfortable sharing information among early childhood service providers, and in fact favor having a single basic application that allows them to check off the agencies to which they would like to apply. Barriers to accessing services are logistical as well as cultural.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityInformation DisseminationSocial WorkAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMarylandSurveys and QuestionnairesCSHCNEarly childhoodInformation sharing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.