Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39589636›Full record

ReviewCVIR endovascular2024

Endovascular treatment of lower limb acute DVT: current trends and future directions.

Francesco Siciliano, Edoardo Ronconi, Tommaso Rossi, Federica Fanelli, Miltiadis Krokidis, Pasqualino Sirignano, Michele Rossi, Marcello Andrea Tipaldi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CVIR endovascular, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco SicilianoDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Edoardo RonconiDepartment of Radiology, Sant'Andrea University Hospital La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Tommaso RossiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155 Sapienza, Rome, 00161, Italy.
Federica FanelliDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Miltiadis KrokidisSchool of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Areteion Hospital , 76 Vas. Sophias Ave, 11528, Athens, Greece.
Pasqualino SirignanoVascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Sant'Andrea Hospital of Rome, Department of General and Specialistic Surgery, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00189, Rome, Italy.
Michele RossiDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" - University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marcello Andrea TipaldiDepartment of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" - University of Rome, Rome, Italy. tipaldi.andrea@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8701-2044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and comparative outcomes of endovascular treatments for acute lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT), including catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT), mechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, drawing insights from a diverse range of studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive literature search identified 33 relevant studies, including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and case reports. Data extraction focused on study design, intervention type, outcome measures, and follow-up duration.

resultsCatheter-directed thrombolysis demonstrates promising results in enhancing venous patency and reducing post-thrombotic syndrome, with careful patient selection being crucial. Pharmacomechanical and mechanical thrombectomy devices offer immediate and long-term benefits, emphasizing individualized patient care. Venous stenting serves as a crucial adjunctive therapy, particularly in cases of residual venous obstruction, though further research is needed for optimal patient selection and long-term outcomes. Timing and selection of endovascular interventions remain critical considerations, necessitating multidisciplinary approaches and ongoing research.

conclusionThis review provides valuable insights for clinicians and researchers, guiding evidence-based decision-making and shaping future research directions in the dynamic field of endovascular interventions for acute lower limb DVT.

Indexed as

Acute vein thrombosisCatheter-directed thrombolysisDeep vein thrombosisEndovascular thrombus removal

Identifiers

PMID39589636
PMCPMC11599677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.