Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39589599›Full record

ArticleHealth economics review2024

Socioeconomic-related inequities in child immunization: horizontal and vertical dimensions for policy insights.

M D Azharuddin Akhtar, Indrani Roy Chowdhury, Pallabi Gogoi, M SriPriya Reddy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M D Azharuddin AkhtarInstitute for Human Development, Delhi, NCR, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7003-3428
Indrani Roy ChowdhuryCentre for the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India. indranircjnu@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3239-5660
Pallabi GogoiCentre for the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-6735
M SriPriya ReddyCentre for the Study of Regional Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2664-4157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incomplete immunization has potentially exposed vulnerable children, especially from the socioeconomically disadvantage group, to vaccine preventable diseases. The schemes would maximize social benefit only when the immunization is effectively distributed on an equitable principle.

methodThe empirical study is based on unit level data from India's National Sample Survey: "Social Consumption: Health Survey- NSS 75th Round (2017-18) database. The nationwide survey is designed on the stratified multi-stage sampling method with an objective to make the sample representative. The egalitarian equity principle requires that distribution of vaccine should be based on health needs of children, irrespective of their socioeconomic and regional factors and the principle is broadly based on two aspects - horizontal and vertical equity. The horizontal inequity (HI) is a direct form of injustice, when children with equal needs of routine immunisation are treated differentially due to their socioeconomic status, while vertical inequity (VI) is indirect form of injustice when children with differential health needs and risks exposure do not receive appropriately unequal but equitable immunisation. Using Indirect Standardisation Method and Erreygers' Corrected Concentration Index, we measure the degree of horizontal and vertical inequities, and then linearly decompose them to identify the major factors contributing towards the respective indices.

conclusionOur findings show that incomplete immunization is significantly concentrated among children belonging to poorer households. After controlling for the confounding effects of need factors, the inequity is still significantly pro-poor (i.e., horizontal inequity). The decomposition reveals that lower education, lower consumption and rural habitation are the major factors driving the corresponding inequity. Further, the differential effect of the needs between all and the target groups (at least based on education), is observed, however, is not statistically significant enough to realize inequity (i.e., no vertical inequity). Overall, the inequity is being induced via non-need factors. We further find that community health services (like anganwadi) have contributed towards reducing the inequity in child immunization significantly. The paper highlights the policy recommendation that the child immunisation program should target factors driving HI and need to align their distribution in terms of risks exposures.

Indexed as

Erreygers’ Corrected Concentration Index (CCI)Horizontal Inequity (HI)ImmunizationIncomplete childIndirect standardisationRisks exposureUniform Monthly Household Per-capita Consumption Expenditure (UMPCE)Vertical Inequity (VI)

Identifiers

PMID39589599
PMCPMC11590263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.