Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39589587›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2024

Bumblebee social learning outcomes correlate with their flower-facing behaviour.

Yuyi Lu, Zhenwei Zhuo, Mark Roper, Lars Chittka, Cwyn Solvi, Fei Peng, Ying Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuyi LuDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, 518110, China.
Zhenwei ZhuoDepartment of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Mark RoperSchool of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.
Lars ChittkaDepartment of Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Cwyn SolviGuangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China.
Fei PengDepartment of Psychology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. fpeng@smu.edu.cn.
Ying ZhouDepartment of Neurology, Shenzhen Hospital, Southern Medical University, Shenzhen, 518110, China. zhouying.smu@hotmail.com.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation,China 2023M731569National Natural Science Foundation of China 31970994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that social learning in bumblebees can occur through second-order conditioning, with conspecifics functioning as first-order reinforcers. However, the behavioural mechanisms underlying bumblebees' acquisition of socially learned associations remain largely unexplored. Investigating these mechanisms requires detailed quantification and analysis of the observation process. Here we designed a new 2D paradigm suitable for simple top-down high-speed video recording and analysed bumblebees' observational learning process using a deep-learning-based pose-estimation framework. Two groups of bumblebees observed live conspecifics foraging from either blue or yellow flowers during a single foraging bout, and were subsequently tested for their socially learned colour preferences. Both groups successfully learned the colour indicated by the demonstrators and spent more time facing rewarding flowers-whether occupied by demonstrators or not-compared to non-rewarding flowers. While both groups showed a negative correlation between time spent facing non-rewarding flowers and learning outcomes, the observer bees in the blue group benefited from time spent facing occupied rewarding flowers, whereas the yellow group showed that time facing unoccupied rewarding flowers by the observer bees positively correlated with their learning outcomes. These results suggest that socially influenced colour preferences are shaped by the interplay of different types of observations rather than merely by observing a conspecific at a single colour. Together, these findings provide direct evidence of the dynamical viewing process of observer bees during social observation, opening up new opportunities for exploring the details of more complex social learning in bumblebees and other insects.

Indexed as

FlowersSocial LearningAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalColorColor PerceptionDeep LearningRewardSocial BehaviorInsectsObservational learningPose-estimationSecond-order conditioning

Identifiers

PMID39589587
PMCPMC11599322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.