ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2025
Comprehensive pathological evaluation of risk factors for metastasis after endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovations in Advanced Endoscopic Resection of Early Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Next step after endoscopic resection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: metastatic risk assessment and management of non-curative resection cases.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Photodynamic therapeutic activity of novel porphyrins against lung squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio for three-year survival in patients with early esophageal cancer undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal cancer is a major cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Endoscopic resection (ER) is a curative treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Predicting risk of metastasis is crucial for post-ER management. In this study, we aimed to identify predictors of metastasis by examining endoscopically resected specimens.
methodsThe cohort of this retrospective multicenter study comprised 422 patients who had undergone ER for ESCC from 1994 to 2017. Inclusion required a histological diagnosis of pT1a-muscularis mucosa or pT1b-submucosa (SM) cancer. Central pathological review comprehensively evaluated depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), droplet infiltration (DI), infiltrative growth pattern, histological differentiation, intraductal and intraglandular involvement, solitary nest, resected margin, and other factors. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of metastasis.
resultsMetastases were identified in 103 patients. Univariate analysis identified LVI, depth of invasion, and DI as significant predictive factors. Multivariate analysis identified LVI, depth of invasion pT1b-SM2 (odds ratio 2.72) and indeterminate (positive vertical margin) (odds ratio 3.63) compared with the reference category of pT1b-SM1 as independent predictors of metastasis. Conversely, there were no significant associations between metastasis and lesion size, differentiation, cytological atypia, or infiltration pattern. Subgroup analysis showed that both the number and layer of LVI were associated with metastasis risk. In addition, four or more foci of DI was an independent predictor of LVI.
conclusionsLVI and depth of invasion were significant predictors of metastasis in ESCC. Detailed pathological evaluation and standardized criteria are essential for accurately assessing risk of metastasis and guiding post-ER treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589535What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.