ArticleAnnals of hematology2024
A simplified geriatric prognostic index to survival in older Asian patients with diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma treated with standard chemo-immunotherapy.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While there are many proposed clinical prediction models for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, like the International Prognostic Index (IPI), revised IPI and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network IPI, there is no widely used model for older patients. A recent study proposed a Geriatric Prognostic Index (GPI) validated in a Norwegian cohort, using independent predictors involving demographic, biochemical and functional parameters. This study aims to validate the GPI in an Asian cohort and simplify the GPI for ease of clinical application. Older patients (age ≥ 70) treated with R-CHOP-like regimens were identified through the Singapore Lymphoma Study. In a retrospective Asian cohort comprising 268 patients, a simplified GPI (sGPI) was created using variables of predictive significance advanced age > 80 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score ≥ 2, serum lactate dehydrogenase level > 3-times upper limit of normal, and stage 3-4, stratifying patients into Low (0), Intermediate (1-2) and High risk (3-4). Cox regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference between risk groups in terms of overall survival (p < 0.00010), with hazard ratios of 1.50 (95% CI: 0.93-2.42), and 4.86 (95% CI: 1.63-14.48), for intermediate and high-risk groups respectively, when compared to the low-risk group. Similar findings were noted for progression free survival (p = 0.00010), with hazard ratios of 1.49 (95% CI: 0.93-2.39) and 4.92 (95% CI: 1.64-14.77) for intermediate and high-risk groups respectively. The sGPI was found to have a C-index of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60-0.70), which was superior to existing models. In conclusion, we have validated the GPI in an Asian cohort. The sGPI demonstrates good predictive value in an Asian cohort as compared to existing prognostic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.