Trial reportAnnals of hematology2024
Venetoclax plus D-CAG (decitabine, cytarabine, aclarubicin, G-CSF) for elderly or unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, prospective study.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Discovery and validation of a robust 11-gene prognostic signature via integrative multi-omics profiling in VD-CAG-treated non-M3 AML.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Induction regimens with satisfactory remission rates are limited for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are elderly or ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. This study is a single-arm, multicenter, prospective phase I/II study (registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry as ChiCTR 2200059694 on May 8, 2022), aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax plus decitabine, cytarabine, aclarubicin, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (VD-CAG) for newly diagnosed AML patients who are elderly or ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was composite complete remission (CRc) after 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy. The secondary endpoints were measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry and adverse events. Forty patients(n = 40) received 1 cycle of the VD-CAG regimen for induction chemotherapy. The median age of the patients was 64 (55-81) years, and 10 patients (25%) had secondary AML. Our results showed that 1 cycle of VD-CAG had a high overall response rate of 97.5% and CRc of 95%, and all 10 patients with secondary AML achieved CRc. Moreover, the patients who achieved CRc had deep remission, with MRD-negativity of 71.1% and 54.2% by flow cytometry and molecular assessment, respectively. In addition, blood cell recovery was quick, with a median time to absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1.0 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589493What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.