ArticleClinical rheumatology2025
A small-scale preliminary study utilizing mass cytometry to distinguish two forms of arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSpondyloarthritis (SpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are hallmarked by immune cell infiltration in synovial joints. Although, in general, different sites are affected, misclassification or delayed diagnosis due to overlapping clinical manifestations is not uncommon. Here, we investigated the diagnostic potential of mass cytometry (MC) in early peripheral SpA (pSpA) and RA patients in a small pilot study.
methodsPeripheral blood and synovial fluid mononuclear cells (PBMC and SFMC) of 4 pSpA, 7 RA, and 1 undifferentiated arthritis (UA) patient(s) were evaluated using a 37-marker MC panel. Data were analyzed through Visualyte services, including dimension reduction, clustering, and Cytofast workflow.
resultsPBMC data indicated naive CD4 T cell, B cell, and monocyte subsets to be differentially present in RA as compared with SpA. CD4 + Tem cell and NK cell subsets appeared more prominently present in pSpA SFMC. Merged PBMC and SFMC data showed overlapping immune profiles of an UA patient with pSpA patients. These results were in accordance with the formal clinical pSpA diagnosis the UA patient received after this study.
conclusionsUtilizing MC, several differences in immune cell composition in both SFMC and PBMC between RA and pSpA patients were observed. Combining PBMC and SFMC data in an unsupervised analysis resulted in the correct classification of the UA patient as pSpA patient prior to formal clinical pSpA diagnosis. This pilot study provides an example of how deep phenotyping with MC aids in differentiating arthritis patients and offers a rationale to further explore these findings. KEY POINTS: •Due to overlapping symptoms and the absence of disease-specific biomarkers, the clinical diagnosis of peripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can be difficult. •Visualizing immune cell profiles of peripheral blood (PB) and synovial fluid (SF) by mass cytometry (MC) suggests differences in immune cell composition between pSpA and RA patients. •Based on immune profiles of combined PB and SF data, we could correctly predict the formal clinical pSpA diagnosis of an undifferentiated arthritis (UA) patient received later. •This pilot study gives an example of how MC might contribute to faster clinical diagnosis of pSpA patients in the absence of biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.