ArticleJournal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT2025
Proximal Muscle Resistance Training to Improve Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Pilot Study.
Article in Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThis pilot study examined the feasibility of a proximal muscle resistance training program to improve walking in people with multiple sclerosis using a combination of in-person, virtual, and independent exercise sessions.
methodsPeople with multiple sclerosis (Expanded Disability Status Scale Score is <6.0) were recruited to a study of resistance training exercises targeting hip abduction and trunk muscles for 10 weeks. Feasibility criteria were: enrolling 40 participants, retaining ≥80%, ≥80% visit adherence, no serious intervention-related adverse events, and ≥80% satisfaction. The 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, muscle performance (hip abduction and lateral trunk flexion strength, and trunk flexion endurance), patient-reported outcomes, daily step count, and pelvis and trunk kinematics were measured before and after intervention. Patient-reported outcomes and step count were measured again 12 weeks after intervention.
resultsTwenty-eight people (median Expanded Disability Status Scale is 3.5) enrolled and 92.8% were retained. Visit adherence was 86.5% (96% for virtual visits, 74% for in-person visits), and 48% of participants preferred virtual visits, while 20% preferred in-person visits. There were no serious intervention-related adverse events, and there was 100% satisfaction. Following intervention, 6-Minute Walk Test distance increased 29.6 m (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-47.0), Timed 25-Foot Walk Test decreased by 0.57 seconds (95% CI, -0.85 to -0.29), and all muscle performance outcomes improved. Patient-reported outcomes also improved immediately following intervention. There were no changes in average daily step count or trunk and pelvis kinematics. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThis proximal muscle resistance training program was feasible, with benefits in walking and muscle strength, warranting a future efficacy study. Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A499 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.