Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39589333›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Tumor aware recurrent inter-patient deformable image registration of computed tomography scans with lung cancer.

Jue Jiang, Chloe Min Seo Choi, Maria Thor, Joseph O Deasy, Harini Veeraraghavan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jue JiangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Chloe Min Seo ChoiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Maria ThorDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Joseph O DeasyDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Harini VeeraraghavanDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Safer lung cancer radiotherapy delivery using novel artificial intelligence methodsR01CA258821 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Harini Veeraraghavan · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
Artificial Intelligence powered virtual digital twins to construct and validate AI automated tools for safer MR-guided adaptive RT of abdominal cancersR01EB032825 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Neelam Tyagi, Harini Veeraraghavan · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Korea Health Industry Development InstituteKorea Health Technology R&D ProjectMinistry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea HI19C1234NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01CA25881NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258821NCI NIH HHS R01CA258821NIBIB NIH HHS EBO32825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVoxel-based analysis (VBA) for population level radiotherapy (RT) outcomes modeling requires topology preserving inter-patient deformable image registration (DIR) that preserves tumors on moving images while avoiding unrealistic deformations due to tumors occurring on fixed images. PURPOSE: We developed a tumor-aware recurrent registration (TRACER) deep learning (DL) method and evaluated its suitability for VBA.

methodsTRACER consists of encoder layers implemented with stacked 3D convolutional long short term memory network (3D-CLSTM) followed by decoder and spatial transform layers to compute dense deformation vector field (DVF). Multiple CLSTM steps are used to compute a progressive sequence of deformations. Input conditioning was applied by including tumor segmentations with 3D image pairs as input channels. Bidirectional tumor rigidity, image similarity, and deformation smoothness losses were used to optimize the network in an unsupervised manner. TRACER and multiple DL methods were trained with 204 3D computed tomography (CT) image pairs from patients with lung cancers (LC) and evaluated using (a) Dataset I (N = 308 pairs) with DL segmented LCs, (b) Dataset II (N = 765 pairs) with manually delineated LCs, and (c) Dataset III with 42 LC patients treated with RT.

resultsTRACER accurately aligned normal tissues. It best preserved tumors, indicated by the smallest tumor volume difference of 0.24%, 0.40%, and 0.13 % and mean square error in CT intensities of 0.005, 0.005, 0.004, computed between original and resampled moving image tumors, for Datasets I, II, and III, respectively. It resulted in the smallest planned RT tumor dose difference computed between original and resampled moving images of 0.01 and 0.013 Gy when using a female and a male reference.

conclusionsTRACER is a suitable method for inter-patient registration involving LC occurring in both fixed and moving images and applicable to voxel-based analysis methods.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep LearningHumansImaging, Three-Dimensionalcomputed tomographydeformable image registrationInter‐patient registrationlung cancerstumor conditioning

Identifiers

PMID39589333
PMCPMC12153972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.