ReviewPhysiological research2024
Pediatric Chronic Heart Failure: Age-Specific Considerations of Medical Therapy.
Review in Physiological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extrapolation of Adult Evidence to Pediatric Practice: Bridging the Gap in Pediatric Heart Failure Pharmacotherapy.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Reveals Novel Pediatric Heart Failure Phenotypes with Distinct Mortality and Hospitalization Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Global Burden and Health Inequalities of Heart Failure Attributable to Chronic Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Analysis from 1990 to 2021.Cardiorenal medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Geospatial disparities in pediatric heart failure care in China: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a rare entity in children but carries a burden of high mortality and morbidity. Medical treatment of pediatric CHF is largely based on guidelines for the adult population. In contrast to adults, evidence for the efficacy of medications in treating CHF in children is sparse. This may be due to the difficulty of conducting high-powered studies in children or to true differences in the mechanisms of CHF pathophysiology. Recent observations suggest that CHF in children differs from adults at the molecular and cellular levels. Different pathways are involved, leading to less fibrosis and hypertrophy than in adults, with potential implications for therapy. The main pathophysiological goals of medical treatment of pediatric CHF due to systemic left ventricular dysfunction are discussed in this review. These include preload and afterload optimization, diminishing cardiomyocyte apoptosis and necrosis as well as interstitial fibrosis, and optimizing myocardial oxygen consumption. The pediatric myocardium should be provided with optimal conditions to achieve its regenerative potential. The cornerstones of medical CHF therapy are angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. There are potential benefits of tissue ACEI and ?1-selective beta blockers in children. Angiotensin receptor blockers are an alternative to ACEI and their slightly different mechanism of action may confer certain advantages and disadvantages. Diuretics are employed to achieve a euvolemic state. Digoxin is used more frequently in children than in adults. Promising new drugs already routinely used in adults include angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and sodium-glucose contransporter 2 inhibitors. Key words: Pediatric heart failure, Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), ACE inhibitor, Beta blocker, Digoxin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589305PMC11627266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.