ReviewPhysiological research2024
Sex Differences in Cardiac Tolerance to Oxygen Deprivation - 40 Years of Cardiovascular Research.
Review in Physiological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in cardiac recovery and ventricular gene expression in a rat model of donation after circulatory death.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Platelet Membrane-Camouflaged Biomimetic Drug Delivery Systems for Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Targeted Therapeutic Strategies.Physiological research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Experimental and clinical studies have clearly demonstrated significant sex differences in myocardial structure and function, both under physiological and pathological conditions. The best example are significant sex differences in the cardiac tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion injury: pre-menopausal adult female hearts are more resistant as compared to the male myocardium. The importance of these findings is supported by the fact that the number of studies dealing with this issue increased significantly in recent years. Detailed molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for sex differences are yet to be elucidated; however, it has been stressed that the differences cannot be explained only by the effect of estrogens. In recent years, a promising new hypothesis has been developed, suggesting that mitochondria may play a significant role in the sex differences in cardiac tolerance to oxygen deprivation. However, one is clear already today: sex differences are so important that they should be taken into consideration in the clinical practice for the selection of the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. The present review attempts to summarize the progress in cardiovascular research on sex-related differences in cardiac tolerance to oxygen deprivation during the last 40 years, i.e. from the first experimental observation. Particular attention was paid to the sex-related differences of the normal heart, sex-dependent tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion injury, the role of hormones and, finally, to the possible role of cardiac mitochondria in the mechanism of sex-dependent differences in cardiac tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion injury. Key words: Female heart, Cardiac hypoxic tolerance, Ischemia-reperfusion injury, Sex differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589300PMC11627269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.