Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39589300›Full record

ReviewPhysiological research2024

Sex Differences in Cardiac Tolerance to Oxygen Deprivation - 40 Years of Cardiovascular Research.

B Ostadal, Z Drahota, M Hlavackova, P Ostadal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

B OstadalInstitute of Physiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. ostadal@biomed.cas.cz.
Z Drahota
M Hlavackova
P Ostadal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental and clinical studies have clearly demonstrated significant sex differences in myocardial structure and function, both under physiological and pathological conditions. The best example are significant sex differences in the cardiac tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion injury: pre-menopausal adult female hearts are more resistant as compared to the male myocardium. The importance of these findings is supported by the fact that the number of studies dealing with this issue increased significantly in recent years. Detailed molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for sex differences are yet to be elucidated; however, it has been stressed that the differences cannot be explained only by the effect of estrogens. In recent years, a promising new hypothesis has been developed, suggesting that mitochondria may play a significant role in the sex differences in cardiac tolerance to oxygen deprivation. However, one is clear already today: sex differences are so important that they should be taken into consideration in the clinical practice for the selection of the optimal diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. The present review attempts to summarize the progress in cardiovascular research on sex-related differences in cardiac tolerance to oxygen deprivation during the last 40 years, i.e. from the first experimental observation. Particular attention was paid to the sex-related differences of the normal heart, sex-dependent tolerance to ischemia-reperfusion injury, the role of hormones and, finally, to the possible role of cardiac mitochondria in the mechanism of sex-dependent differences in cardiac tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion injury. Key words: Female heart, Cardiac hypoxic tolerance, Ischemia-reperfusion injury, Sex differences.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMitochondria, HeartMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryMyocardiumOxygenSex FactorsOxygen

Identifiers

PMID39589300
PMCPMC11627269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.