ArticlePhysiological research2024
Does Hypoxia Prompt Fetal Brain-Sparing in the Absence of Fetal Growth Restriction?
Article in Physiological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding physiological adaptations of pregnancy to the chronic hypoxia of high altitude to inform obstetrical and neonatal care.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- Does gestational age influence the predictive accuracy of the cerebroplacental ratio for intrapartum fetal compromise?AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Association Between Endotype of Prematurity and Cystic Periventricular Leukomalacia: A Bayesian Model-Averaged Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fetus develops normally in a hypoxic environment but exaggerated hypoxia late in pregnancy is a worrisome sign often observed in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placental insufficiency, or fetal growth restriction (FGR). Serial fetal biometry and the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR, calculated as the middle cerebral artery [MCA] / the umbilical artery [UmbA] pulsatility indices [PI]), are commonly used to indicate fetal "brain sparing" resulting from exaggerated fetal hypoxia. But unclear is the extent to which a low CPR indicates pathology or is a physiological response for maintaining cerebral blood flow. We studied 31 appropriate for gestational age (AGA) pregnancies at low (LA, 1670 m) or high (HA, 2879 m) altitude, given the chronic hypoxia imposed by HA residence, and 54 LA women with a clinical diagnosis of FGR. At week 34, the MCA PI was lower in the LA-FGR than the LA-AGA group but lower still in the HA-AGA compared to either LA groups due to a trend toward higher end-diastolic velocity (EDV). We concluded that the lower MCA PI was likely due to greater cerebral vasodilation in the HA AGA group and an indication of physiological versus pathological fetal hypoxia. Future reporting of serial MCA and UmbA values and their determinants along with the CPR could improve our ability to distinguish between physiological and pathological fetal brain sparing. Keywords: Birth weight, Cerebroplacental ratio, Fetal physiology, HDP, High altitude.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39589298PMC11627262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.