SynthesisThe oncologist2025
Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of health state utility values in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Synthesis in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of second-generation androgen receptor antagonists for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite being an important goal, the preservation of quality of life of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is poorly characterized across lines of therapy. In this review, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted to synthesize EuroQoL 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) data among adult men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic mCRPC in both first line (1L) and second line and later (2L+) therapy. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to October 2022 using Ovid. Supplemental searches of other data sources were also conducted (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021283512). Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate pooled EQ-5D index utility values and EQ visual analog scale (VAS) scores in both 1L and 2L+. Various sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Forty-five unique publications met the inclusion criteria. In primary studies, baseline EQ-5D index utility values ranged from 0.7 to 0.9 in 1L and 0.63 to 0.7 in 2L+. Twelve trials and observational studies were feasible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean baseline EQ-5D index utility value was estimated as 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.84) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71) for 1L (n = 7 studies) and 2L + (n = 4 studies), respectively. The pooled mean baseline EQ VAS score was estimated as 74.63 (95% CI, 70.97-78.29) and 65.82 (95% CI, 64.53-67.11) in 1L and 2L+, respectively. Limitations include hampered comparability between studies due to heterogeneity in study design and geographical regions. This study provides a comprehensive synthesis of EQ-5D data presently available in adults with mCRPC in both 1L and 2L + therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.