Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588855›Full record

ArticleDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)2025

Trends of diagnostic adverse events in hospital deaths: longitudinal analyses of four retrospective record review studies.

Jacky Hooftman, Laura Zwaan, Jonne J Sikkens, Bo Schouten, Martine C de Bruijne, Cordula Wagner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jacky HooftmanDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8375-6609
Laura ZwaanErasmus Medical Center, Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam (iMERR), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3940-1699
Jonne J SikkensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5481-5596
Bo SchoutenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6387-7633
Martine C de BruijneDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1838-1158
Cordula WagnerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2301-2640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate longitudinal trends in the incidence, preventability, and causes of DAEs (diagnostic adverse events) between 2008 and 2019 and compare DAEs to other AE (adverse event) types.

methodsThis study investigated longitudinal trends of DAEs using combined data from four large Dutch AE record review studies. The original four AE studies included 100-150 randomly selected records of deceased patients from around 20 hospitals in each study, resulting in a total of 10,943 patient records. Nurse reviewers indicated cases with potential AEs using a list of triggers. Subsequently, experienced physician reviewers systematically judged the occurrence of AEs, the clinical process in which these AEs occurred, and the preventability and causes.

resultsThe incidences of DAEs, potentially preventable DAEs and potentially preventable DAE-related deaths initially declined between 2008 and 2012 (2.3 vs. 1.2; OR=0.52, 95 % CI: 0.32 to 0.83), after which they stabilized up to 2019. These trends were largely the same for other AE types, although compared to DAEs, the incidence of other AE types increased between 2016 (DAE: 1.0, other AE types: 8.5) and 2019 (DAE: 0.8, other AE types: 13.0; rate ratio=1.88, 95 % CI: 1.12 to 2.13). Furthermore, DAEs were more preventable (p<0.001) and were associated with more potentially preventable deaths (p=0.016) than other AE types. In addition, DAEs had more and different underlying causes than other AE types (p<0.001). The DAE causes remained stable over time, except for patient-related factors, which increased between 2016 and 2019 (29.5 and 58.6 % respectively, OR=3.40, 95 % CI: 1.20 to 9.66).

conclusionsAfter initial improvements of DAE incidences in 2012, no further improvement was observed in Dutch hospitals in the last decade. Similar trends were observed for other AEs. The high rate of preventability of DAEs suggest a high potential for improvement, that should be further investigated.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ErrorsHospital MortalityAgedFemaleHospitalsHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRetrospective Studiesdiagnostic adverse eventdiagnostic errordiagnostic safetyepidemiologylongitudinal researchpatient safety

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.