Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588651›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

Accounting for Fast vs Slow Exchange in Single Molecule FRET Experiments Reveals Hidden Conformational States.

Justin J Miller, Upasana L Mallimadugula, Maxwell I Zimmerman, Melissa D Stuchell-Brereton, Andrea Soranno, Gregory R Bowman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. PathogenicThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Justin J MillerDepartments of Biochemistry & Biophysics and Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9400-8916
Upasana L MallimadugulaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States.
Maxwell I ZimmermanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0721-0652
Melissa D Stuchell-BreretonDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States.
Andrea SorannoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8394-7993
Gregory R BowmanDepartments of Biochemistry & Biophysics and Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2083-4892

Funding

Project 4 (Genetic modifiers for APOE-associated Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis)U19AG069701 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI DAVID M. HOLTZMAN · 2021 to 2026
$42.0M
Structural basis for ApoE4-induced Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG067194 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BOWMAN, GREGORY · 2021 to 2021
$1.8M
Understanding and controlling protein energy landscapes by combining simulations and experimentsR35GM152085 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Gregory Bowman · 2024 to 2026
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG067194NIA NIH HHS U19 AG069701NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM152085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are dynamic systems whose structural preferences determine their function. Unfortunately, building atomically detailed models of protein structural ensembles remains challenging, limiting our understanding of the relationships between sequence, structure, and function. Combining single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments with molecular dynamics simulations could provide experimentally grounded, all-atom models of a protein's structural ensemble. However, agreement between the two techniques is often insufficient to achieve this goal. Here, we explore whether accounting for important experimental details like averaging across structures sampled during a given smFRET measurement is responsible for this apparent discrepancy. We present an approach to account for this time-averaging by leveraging the kinetic information available from Markov state models of a protein's dynamics. This allows us to accurately assess which time scales are averaged during an experiment. We find this approach significantly improves agreement between simulations and experiments in proteins with varying degrees of dynamics, including the well-ordered protein T4 lysozyme, the partially disordered protein apolipoprotein E (ApoE), and a disordered amyloid protein (Aβ40). We find evidence for hidden states that are not apparent in smFRET experiments because of time averaging with other structures, akin to states in fast exchange in nuclear magnetic resonance, and evaluate different force fields. Finally, we show how remaining discrepancies between computations and experiments can be used to guide additional simulations and build structural models for states that were previously unaccounted for. We expect our approach will enable combining simulations and experiments to understand the link between sequence, structure, and function in many settings. Understanding protein dynamics is crucial for understanding protein function, yet few methodologies report on protein motion at an atomic level. Combining single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments with computer simulations could provide atomistic models of protein ensembles which are grounded in experiments, however, there has been limited agreement between the two methods to date. Here, we present an algorithm to recapitulate smFRET experiments from molecular dynamics simulations. This approach significantly improves agreement between simulations and experiments for proteins across the ordered spectrum. Moreover, with this approach we can confidently create atomic models for states observed during smFRET experiments which were otherwise difficult to model due to high amounts of flexibility, disorder, or large deviations from crystal-like states.

Indexed as

Amyloid beta-PeptidesFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferMolecular Dynamics SimulationMuramidaseApolipoproteins EBacteriophage T4KineticsMarkov ChainsPeptide FragmentsProtein ConformationAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-40)Apolipoproteins EMuramidasePeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID39588651
PMCPMC11886876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.