Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588530›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Retrospective Analysis of Rituximab Therapy for Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Series.

Abeer S Albalawi, Mohammed Alharbi, Thamer S Albalawi

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abeer S AlbalawiNeuroscience Department, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, SAU.
Mohammed AlharbiNeuroscience Department, King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, SAU.
Thamer S AlbalawiLaboratory Department, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Tabouk, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a neuromuscular junction disorder that involves several dysfunctions that eventually lead to muscle fatigue and weakness. Although immunotherapeutics are considered an effective treatment option for MG, treatment-refractory cases are documented. In this case report, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in treating three cases of myasthenia gravis admitted to the neurology department of a tertiary hospital. We conducted a retrospective analysis on three cases of MG treated with rituximab at the neurology department of King Abdullah Medical Hospital. Rituximab was used as a first-line treatment in three patients with new-onset, non-refractory generalized MG who tested positive for acetylcholine receptor antibodies and failed to respond adequately to conventional therapies. Changes in disease severity and quality of life were assessed using the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MG-QOL15) scale. We observed a significant improvement in disease symptoms and quality of life in all patients. Additionally, the oral prednisolone dose was reduced to less than 15 mg for all patients, with no reported side effects. This study suggests that patients with MG who test positive for acetylcholine receptor antibodies may benefit from rituximab as a safe and effective treatment alternative. In the three cases included in this analysis, rituximab led to notable improvements in quality of life, general clinical condition, and muscle weakness. Further studies with larger patient populations and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these results and provide a more comprehensive understanding of rituximab's role in MG treatment.

Indexed as

acetylcholine receptormg-qol15myasthenia gravisneuromuscular junction disorderrituximab

Identifiers

PMID39588530
PMCPMC11586585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.