ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2020
Simulation of high-resolution test objects using non-isocentric acquisition geometries in next-generation digital tomosynthesis.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Line-based iterative geometric calibration method for a tomosynthesis system.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Non-Isocentric Geometry for Next-Generation Tomosynthesis With Super-Resolution.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Impact of Tomosynthesis Acquisition on 3D Segmentations of Breast Outline and Adipose/Dense Tissue with AI: A Simulation-Based Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Multiclass Segmentation of Suspicious Findings in Simulated Breast Tomosynthesis Images Using a U-Net.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2022Article
- Development and Evaluation of the Fourier Spectral Distortion Metric.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Next generation tomosynthesis image acquisition optimization for dedicated PET-DBT attenuation corrections.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2021Article
- Achieving Isotropic Super-Resolution with a Non-Isocentric Acquisition Geometry in a Next-Generation Tomosynthesis System.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
- Pre-clinical evaluation and optimization of image quality for a Next Generation Tomosynthesis prototype.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
- Novel Perlin-based Phantoms Using 3D Models of Compressed Breast Shape and Fractal Noise.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) systems utilize an isocentric acquisition geometry which introduces imaging artifacts that are deleterious to image reconstructions. The next-generation tomosynthesis (NGT) prototype was designed to incorporate various x-ray source and detector motions for the purpose of investigating alternative acquisition geometries for DBT. Non-isocentric acquisition geometries, acquisitions that vary the image magnification between projection images, are capable of ameliorating aliasing and other artifacts that are intrinsic to conventional DBT. We used virtual clinical trials (VCTs) to develop custom acquisition geometries for the NGT prototype. A high-resolution (5μm voxel size) star pattern test object was simulated to compare the high-frequency performance of isocentric with non-isocentric image reconstructions. A tilted bar pattern test object was also simulated to compare multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) of isocentric and non-isocentric acquisition geometries. Two source- and detector-motion paths were simulated to obtain super-sampled image reconstructions of the test objects. An aliasing-sensitive metric was used to evaluate spatial resolution performance for two orthogonal frequency orientations. Pairwise comparisons were made for the two frequency orientations between the isocentric and non-isocentric acquisition geometries. Non-isocentric acquisition geometries show an improvement over isocentric acquisition geometries. The greatest improvement was 75.2% for frequencies aligned perpendicular to x-ray source motion, which is the direction of frequencies for which DBT is prone to aliasing. Both frequency orientations exhibit super resolution for non-isocentric geometries. MPR of the tilted bar pattern show z- dependent degeneracies for the isocentric acquisition only, whereas MPR of the non-isocentric acquisition entirely exhibits super resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.