ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2024
Effects of Surgery on Hemodynamics and Postoperative Delirium in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram-based risk prediction model for postoperative delirium in patients with stanford type A aortic dissection.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of surgical intervention on hemodynamic parameters and postoperative delirium in Stanford Type A aortic dissection patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 139 patients who underwent surgery for Stanford Type A aortic dissection from February 2022 to February 2024. Hemodynamic parameters, including maximum ascending aortic diameter (MAAD), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDd), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were compared pre- and post-surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on delirium occurrence postoperatively: Group A (n=49, with delirium) and Group B (n=90, without delirium). Differences in surgical factors and intensive care conditions were analyzed, and risk factors for postoperative delirium were identified. Group sizes differ due to retrospective categorization based on observed outcomes rather than controlled sampling. Results: ① Hemodynamic parameters: Postoperative MAAD and LVEDd were significantly reduced, while LVEF increased compared to preoperative levels (P < 0.05). ② Surgical and postoperative conditions: Group A had longer surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest times than Group B (P < 0.05). ③ Univariate analysis of baseline data: Group A had higher rates of patients aged ≥60, hypertension, history of stroke, and elevated preoperative D-dimer levels (P < 0.05). ④ Multivariate logistic analysis: Independent risk factors for postoperative delirium included age ≥60, hypertension, history of stroke, surgery time >6 hours, cardiopulmonary bypass time >3 hours, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time >40 minutes (OR > 1, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Surgical treatment of Stanford Type A aortic dissection has a good effect, significantly improving long-term cardiac function. However, the incidence of postoperative delirium is relatively high and is closely related to factors such as age, hypertension, history of stroke, surgery time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.