ArticleEuropean oral research2024
Effect of ionizing radiation on the microstructure and physical properties of endodontic gutta-percha points.
Article in European oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Patients undergoing radiotherapy for head or neck cancer often require root canal treatments, which can be compromised by the effects of radiation. This investigation aimed to determine whether ionizing radiation (IR), in doses similar to those used in conventional therapy, affects the surface and physicomechanical properties of various brands of endodontic gutta-percha points (EGPs). Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty-three EGPs from three brands (Meta-Biomed, Dentsply, and Hygenic) were divided into groups and either exposed or not exposed to IR at a total dose of 50 Gy, divided into 25 fractions. Tensile strength and microhardness tests were performed on all EGPs. Scanning electron microscopy was utilized to identify possible microstructural surface changes due to IR exposure. The proportion of organic to inorganic components in each brand was also determined. Results: Exposure to IR resulted in significant changes only in the EGPs from the Meta-Biomed brand, including a notable decrease in tensile strength and an increase in microhardness. Furthermore, the surface microstructure of these EGPs displayed dark lines and striations over a large area, with some lines deeply embedded in the center and cavities of variable depths and extensions observed, leading to irregular and non-smooth surfaces. This brand had the highest proportion of organic components. Conclusion: The physicomechanical properties and surface microstructure of Meta-Biomed brand EGPs were significantly affected by IR at doses used in conventional therapy for head or neck cancer, while the other brands were less affected or unaffected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.