ArticleEuropean oral research2024
Management of jump space in immediate implants with and without demineralised freeze dried bone allograft: a randomised controlled trial.
Article in European oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended platelet rich fibrin versus allograft as a space filling material in immediate dental implant placement.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Immediate dental implants: insights into early and late failures from a large-scale Chinese cohort.BMC oral health · 2026Observational
- Immediate implant placement with and without platelet-rich fibrin and decalcified freeze-dried bone graft.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the management of Jump space (JS) in immediate implants with and without Demineralised freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) with flapless approach. Materials and methods: The present study included 40 sites with immediate implant placement in the maxillary anterior region. Group 1 patients were treated without augmentation while Group 2 patients with DFDBA in the JS. Both the groups were further subdivided according to the horizontal dimensions as JS less (G1S1, G2S1) or more than 2mm (G1S2, G2S2). Plaque index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Probing depth (PD), Testori esthetic score (TS), VAS score, Crestal Bone height (CBH), Ridge width (RW), Vertical distance (VD) and radiolucent area (RA) were evaluated radiographically with CBCT at baseline and 12 months' post therapy. Results: Significant differences were observed in CBH in the midfacial region in G1S1-G2S1 with the mean of 0.34±0.19mm and G1S2 -G2S2 with 0.75±0.26 mm at 12 months. Significant differences in TS were observed in G1S1 and G2S1 with mean value of 0.55±0.53 while G1S2 and G2S2 exhibited value of 1.33±0.82. Conclusion: DFDBA shows better CBH preservation in midfacial region, reduction in RA indicating greater resolution of JS thereby leading to better hard and soft tissue healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.