Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588453›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

The Impact of the Combination of Proteolytic Enzyme and Rutin on the Post-operative Management of Inflammation: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind, Comparative Clinical Trial.

Piyush C Rathi, Chandrakant L Rathi, Shilpa P Risbud, Gayatri P Ganu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Piyush C RathiResearch and Development, Advanced Vital Enzymes Private Limited (ADVENZA), Thane, IND.
Chandrakant L RathiResearch and Development, Advanced Vital Enzymes Private Limited (ADVENZA), Thane, IND.
Shilpa P RisbudResearch and Development, Advanced Vital Enzymes Private Limited (ADVENZA), Thane, IND.
Gayatri P GanuPharmacology, Mprex Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Pune, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Post-operative wound infections are a common complication that may impede recovery and require longer hospital stays. These infections substantially impact patient outcomes, increasing the likelihood of complications and healthcare expenses. Effective management of inflammation and pain is crucial for optimizing post-operative care. Method In this study, a total of 65 patients were randomized to either one of the three groups - EnMax tablet (Advanced Vital Enzymes Private Limited (ADVENZA), Thane, India) along with standard of care (SOC), Placebo tablet along with SOC, and Marketed reference preparation along with SOC. Follow-up visits were conducted on days 1, 3, 6, and 8. Results On day 8, EnMax demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in inflammation scores of 91.49%, compared to 80% with the marketed reference preparation and 63.64% with placebo. The EnMax group also showed a greater reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores of 95.29% compared to the marketed reference preparation of 86.42%. Significant reductions in C-reactive protein (CRP) of 51.24% and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at 59.80% were observed in the EnMax group, while the marketed reference preparation showed reductions of 35.23% and 46.38%, respectively. Both patient and investigator assessments favored EnMax over the marketed reference and placebo formulation. The study reported no adverse events, with stable vital signs and clinically insignificant changes in complete blood count (CBC), indicating the safety and tolerability of the investigational products. Conclusion EnMax, a combination of systemic microbial and plant proteases with the herbal component rutin, achieved significant reductions in post-operative inflammation, pain, and analgesic use, and improved overall patient and investigator assessment scores, outperforming placebo and demonstrating comparable, slightly superior efficacy to the marketed reference preparation. This study not only serves as a valuable guideline for current clinical practice in managing post-surgical inflammation and pain but also establishes a robust baseline for further research in postoperative care and other inflammatory conditions.

Indexed as

inflammationpainproteaseproteolytic enzymerutin

Identifiers

PMID39588453
PMCPMC11587191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.