ArticleCureus2024
Factors Related to the Growth of Oral Bacteria After Surgery: An Observational Study of 54 Patients Undergoing Oncologic or Cardiac Surgery.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacterial counts in saliva of patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Cross-sectional research.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Postoperative complications, such as surgical site infection and postoperative pneumonia, may be caused by oral bacteria. This study aimed to clarify the factors related to the bacterial count in the saliva of postoperative patients so as to standardize oral management methods before and after surgery. Methods This prospective observational study enrolled 54 patients who underwent major oncologic or cardiac surgery. The following variables were investigated: age, sex, primary disease, body mass index, performance status, smoking, alcohol consumption, serum creatinine and albumin, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of teeth, functional tooth unit, plaque control record (PCR), amount of dental plaque, community periodontal index, eating status the day after surgery, oral wetness, and number of bacteria in the saliva before and after surgery. The relationship between each variable and the number of bacteria in the saliva before and after surgery was analyzed. Results Multiple regression analysis revealed that the PCR was significantly associated with the number of bacteria in the saliva before surgery (p=0.021). On the day after surgery, the number of bacteria in saliva was significantly higher than that before surgery (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that eating status the day after surgery (p=0.046) and oral wetness (p=0.043) were significantly associated with the number of bacteria, but dental plaque did not influence the bacterial count. Conclusions Postoperative salivary bacterial counts increased due to reduced oral self-cleaning, regardless of dental plaque content. Therefore, oral feeding should be started promptly after surgery to reduce the number of bacteria in the saliva.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.